![](https://leanleftworld.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/internet.jpg?w=612)
We now know how Republicans view the world. In their haste to make sure they gain total control, their answer to every social issue facing our country and our people is to ban everything they don’t like. Instead of holding meaningful conversations about issues like public education or civil rights, they simply pick out parts they don’t like and ban it.
In something weird, at least to me, if a book contains something they consider “sexual” or has anything to do with slavery being “bad”, the book must be banned. However, if a book explicitly describes mass killings, that book can sit on y0ur school library’s shelf.
We have reached a banning frenzy in our country. Yes, we do need to look at things that affect our children. But, instead of simply banning everything, why not hold discussions in an intellectual manner and come to real solutions to these problems.
Social media is in the crosshairs now. Yes, there are valid complaints about too many hours being spent on social media by our children. But, so far, I have not seen anything that really addresses the issue. Instead of looking at legal ways to make social media companies more responsible when dealing with our children, politicians only want to ban it.
In Utah, the governor signed two bills concerning social media and minors under the age of 18. The bills say that between the hours of 10:30 pm and 6:30 am children are banned from accessing social media. Okay, but how are you going to enforce such a law? How is the state going to know if a 14 year old is on social media after 10:30 pm?
Then the bills require age verification for anyone who wishes to use social media in the state. They also want to prevent tech companies from luring kids to their apps using addictive features. Of course, I haven’t found any definition of “addictive features” in the bill.
Again, just how is the state going to enforce the parental permission part? We know children are very knowledgeable when it comes to apps and computers. We also know that children have figured out a way around parental permission already necessary for children under 13 under federal law.
Now, parts of the bill do make sense. I have always been troubled by internet providers and apps tracking our every move on the internet. I am sick of looking up something on the internet and then getting bombarded with ads on just about every app I use about what I looked up. Internet companies are mining us for information in order to sell that information to others who wish to bombard us with their ads.
That brings us to a very dangerous part of this bill. For the first time, I actually agree with an internet lobbyist group who chimed in against this bill. Nicole Saad Bembridge, an associate director at NetChoice said: “Utah will soon require online services to collect sensitive information about teens and families, not only to verify ages, but to verify parental relationships, like government-issued IDs and birth certificates, putting their private data at risk of breach.”
That danger is not addressed in the bill. I cannot figure out any other way in which you can verify ages or proper parental consent without having to use these official documents. And, since hacking of personal information from the internet is a growing crime, how can the state require such personal information to be used to enforce this law?
Utah is not the only state considering such laws. At least four other red states are looking at similar bills. They all claim that these laws are intended to protect children from harmful effects from the internet. That sounds very likeable. However, they are very slim on just what they mean by “harmful” effects.
We must also look at the possibility of whether or not these states are really only interested in making sure children are allowed access only to “approved” sites. Are they really looking out for our children, or are they simply banning them from sites that politicians don’t like for any number of reasons?
We must ask that question because they have already passed laws that will harm certain groups of people and children. I mean, right now 22 red states are suing the administration over a law that bans free school lunches from being denied to LGBTQ children. These 22 states believe that if these children are LGBTQ, they should just go hungry. In Idaho, a bill that would have provided free menstruation products to girls in public schools was voted down. I guess girls in Idaho are expected to be “embarrassed” for having their period suddenly without any tampons available.
I am not arguing about not looking into how social media affects our children. I am all for it. However, we cannot simply use a banning process to try to solve our problems. The problem is that Republicans have taken to the banning process instead of coming up with real and meaningful solutions.
I guess the reason is because it is much easier to simply place a ban on things instead of using actual brain power to find solutions. Using brain power takes energy and imagination. It also means we can find real solutions.
Unfortunately, we know that Republicans are not interested in real solutions. If we fix problems, they don’t have anything to bitch about and play the victim over. Bitching and playing the victim are the only two things Republicans are good at.